🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would require payments from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I know multiple clients that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with supporting medical services. When you add those costs versus our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like many federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation is that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.