🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an observance that started out as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass gatherings where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has evolved since those days, giving reduced attention to the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how important it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels emboldened to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a source of worry. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to remove Black history and narrative from the archives is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the month represents how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) included in educational programs. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Establishments who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and awareness of “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.