🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest has ceased to be a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that those in power allow or withhold as they see fit. This constitutes the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the current government is advancing, which would dictate when and where demonstrations can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who defy these restrictions.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Earlier administrations had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which global rights bodies had censured as "serious and unjustified limitations" on civil liberties. Collectively, these incremental attacks on liberty have practically abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Atrocity to Justify Suppression

The most recent limitations are being defended by referring to last week's terrible antisemitic assault on a Manchester mosque. There should be widespread consensus that the security of British Jews must be protected. However, employing this atrocity as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"If you can't draw the line at mass killing, you likely cannot draw the line at democracy," observed a prominent American author, a statement that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's rich history of protest and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these historical demonstrators were branded as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the global justice body to release arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would support a complete ban on arms sales to the nation, and back the detention of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a despicable antisemitic crime to try to suppress a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this effort. Ministers have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish heritage with the policies of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have declared that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "implicated" in alleged abuse faced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from 24 months of ongoing violence that have claimed tens of thousands of lives. British politicians and media outlets have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of discrimination in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a dangerous boundary by banning a specific activist group, a peaceful, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, primarily for carrying signs against mass killing and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; among them a retired priest and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader implied that some were "connected to" other nations, while the sitting leader described such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to control dissent. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors struggled, suffered and died to secure our liberties. We may eventually regret how easily we permitted them to be eroded.